Flipkart.comGet Free Home Delivery & attractive Discount, Type Book/Author Name to see
Pol_E Eern India Pol_E
Showing posts with label National issues. Show all posts
Showing posts with label National issues. Show all posts

Thursday, 28 June 2012

Issue of Petrol-ethanol blending in India

Bioethanol is a form of renewable energy that can be produced from agricultural feedstocks. It can be made from very common crops such as sugar cane, potato, manioc and corn through fermentation, distillation and dehydration techniques.

Advantages of Using Ethanol as fuel-

1.   Dependence on imported Oil reduces.
2.   increased domestic ethanol production would also create more jobs
3.   Ethanol burns cleaner than gasoline(petrol) meaning less greenhouse gas emissions are emitted.
4.   Adding ethanol to gasoline in lower percentages, such as 10 percent ethanol and 90 percent gasoline (E10), reduces carbon monoxide emissions from the gasoline 

Disadvantages-

1.   Food security- With higher production of ethanol there will be increased cost of food prices and food shortages because much of the arable land would be used for ethanol production instead to produce food.
2.   Ethanol tends to be very corrosive because it can easily absorb water and dirt and without the proper filtration system ethanol can soon cause the corrosion inside the engine block.
3.   Ethanol has 34% lower energy per unit volume compared to gasoline, hence greater amount of ethanol needed to travel the same distance.

Petrol-ethanol blending in India

In India, a large proportion of available ethanol comes as a byproduct from cane molasses during sugar production. Thus ethanol production is less likely to reduce food security. Instead it would lead to better returns for sugar cane farmers and consequently better sugarcane and sugar production. India is the second largest sugarcane and sugar producer in the world, after Brazil. In Brazil, blending is mandatory up to 25 per cent of ethanol with petrol.

In January 2003, the government decides for a 5-percent ethanol blend in gasoline through its ambitious Ethanol Blending Program (EBP).
The government mandated 5 per cent blending in September 2006; raised the level to 10 per cent in October 2007; and made such blending compulsory in October 2008. Further, in 2008, the Cabinet approved the National Policy on Biofuel, which envisaged blending of biofuels with petrol and diesel to a level of 20 per cent by 2017.

The oil marketing companies have failed to achieve even 5 per cent blending countrywide. Owing to
1.   conflicting views among the Ministries of Chemicals and Fertilizers, Agriculture, and Petroleum and Natural Gas,
2.   the reluctance of some State governments to require sugar units to make available adequate quantities of ethanol for the fuel industry because more lucrative options offered by the liquor industry for production of industrial and portable alcohol.
3.   the lack of competent processing technologies has made cost of production of ethanol comparatively higher.
4.   failure to set ethanol pricing formula for ethanol. The sugar industry and ethanol manufacturers have been supplying ethanol. For the past 18 months at a provisional price of Rs 27 a litre, though their alternative products from molasses are fetching Rs 34-35 a litre.

The pricing of ethanol is complicated by the decontrol of petrol prices and administered pricing of sugarcane. Given the cyclical nature of sugarcane, a periodic review of ethanol prices becomes critical. The core issue is the controversy over the price at which oil companies will procure ethanol from sugar firms. Since ethanol-blended petrol and fossil fuel-based petrol are likely to be priced the same at the retail end, blending at the ethanol price of Rs 27 per litre will result in losses for oil marketing companies.

Import of ethanol complicates the pricing issue further. Brazil has been the single-largest source for Indian ethanol imports over the years. A comparison of the delivered cost of imported ethanol from Brazil and domestic ethanol shows that in recent months, the cost of imports was higher.

To make sure that sectoral shortages are kept to the minimum, sufficient investments in ethanol storage facilities and R&D should be encouraged. Other sources of ethanol like jatropha, seaweed, cellulose waste from agro-forestry should be explored.  Plantation of bio-diesel producing plants on waste /degraded / marginal lands should be considered.

Wednesday, 20 June 2012

PF contributions slipping, cloud over ‘pay-as-you-go’ model

  • Contributions to the Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO), the country’s largest and only social security fund for formal sector workers, has slipped into negative territory for the first time in years.
  • With a Rs 5-lakh crore corpus, the fund is still the country’s second largest non-bank financial institution after the Life insurance Corporation of India.  
  • Under current guidelines, workers earning upto Rs 6,500 per month in organisations with over 20 employees, are mandatorily part of the EPF scheme. Those earning over this threshold can join the EPF voluntarily. 
  •  The slip is largely due to the fact that many workers have been pushed out of the mandatory EPFO net as a number of states have raised minimum wages. Besides, with an increasing number of workers coming into the job force as contractual employees, they are out of the PF net. 
  • The government currently provides a susbidy of 1.16 per cent of salaries (for a maximum of Rs 6,500 per month) to the EPF, which is used for payouts to the provident fund and the related Employees’ Pension Scheme. Increasing the wage cap, would entail a higher subsidy payout for the Centre as well.  

'Pay As You Go Pension Plan'

  • A retirement scheme where the plan beneficiaries decide how much they want to contribute either by having the specified amount regularly deducted from their paycheck or by contributing the desired amount in a lump sum. 
  • The employee can choose among the various investment options and decide on whether they want a higher return by investing in a more risky fund or a safer fund which provides steady returns. 
  • When retirement age comes along, the beneficiary can choose to either receive the benefits in a lump sum or as a lifetime annuity where the benefits are spread in monthly payments throughout the beneficiary's lifetime. This is different from a fully funded pension where the company fully funds, manages and distributes the benefits at retirement.  

     


Monday, 18 June 2012

PURA Provisioning of Urban Amenities in Rural Areas


Context : PURA re-released as PURA 2.0
  • 1500cr in 12th plan- measly support for a positive program to develop infra in rapidly urbanizing but unrecognized Census Towns, increases CT from Rs. 1000 to Rs. 3200 cr in 10 years (Census Towns -> town having more than 5,000 populations with a density of 400 people per square kilometer and where the male population engaged in non-agricultural activities is more than 75 percent)
  • private companies in consultation with Gram Panchayats, which will be the nodal agency, can take up projects like sanitation, water supply, street lighting, roads and solid and liquid waste management on user-charges basis in the census towns
  •  Rural Development Ministry providing a grant of 40 to 50 crore rupees; 70 to 80 crore rupees will be mobilized by ongoing central schemes, while the private sector is expected to bring in about 20 crore rupees. The Private Company in consulation with the Gram Panchayat will get the lease of 10 years for the physical infrastructure to be developed in such towns to recover the investment

Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid
  • Tested business modes  ITC e choupal, HUL Shakti rural women entrepreneus, Tata Kisan Kendra, DCM shriram hariuali kisaan bazaar, SEWA, BASIX
  • Public private partnership has seen Common Service centres under SEWA SREI sahaj e- village program -CSCSs in 6 states, providing G2C and B2C
    • Common service centers - CSC operator as a Village level Entrepreneur VLE, State Center Agency SCA, State designated agency SDA , 3tier system
    • Sahaj , a non banking finance company SREI subsidiary, part of NeGP - last mile access to organizations looking to offer services to >2000 population villages
      • VLEs are local entrepreneurs , who offer services like zZIT education, tailway tickets, mobile recharge, insurance cover etc  -
PURA 1.0 (APJ Abdul Kalam's idea)
Freedom to PPP to provide add on revenue generating facilities like Village Linked Tourism Rural markets, warehousing, schools integrated rural hubs

  • 15 clusters in 10 states, amenities by private players - water supply sewage roads drainage and telecom and electricity ,funding support by ADB and MEA as well 
  • Bharat nirman, private investments and O&M for 10 years under contract, growth center of gram panchayat core- infra + economic regeneration
  • Features  25 sq km 3-4 Panchayats, roads, drainage, 5 pits for SWM, Skill development  Lead Economic Activity, street lights, internet kiosks, biomass gas generation, 1MW plant
  • PPP 78:22 for infra, 100% orivate for revenue generation, VGF, Risk mititgation and rish sharing between shareholders
  • Total 619 districts, 6484 blocks, 2,55,000 panchayats, 5,93,731 villages, 5.4cr BPL hh
  • Model
    • Micro consumer/producer and innovators connected physically, financially, and information/knowledge based with rural entrepreneurs, giving him economic connectivity with formal economy
    • Convergence seen in NRLM, TSC and NRWDP in capital expenditure  provisioning, private player gets land free for public amenities, revenue sharing for other activities, after 10 years, reverts back to GP/state for maintenance and use

Friday, 15 June 2012

Production sharing contract

An agreement between Contractor and Government whereby Contractor bears all exploration risks, production and development costs in return for its stipulated share of production resulting from this effort. These costs are recoverable in case of commercial discovery. 


The title of the hydrocarbons remains with the State. The State maintains regulatory control and the Contractor is responsible for the execution of petroleum operations in accordance to the terms of the contract.

The contract is based on a production sharing and not on profit sharing basis.

During the term of the contract, after allowance for up to a specified percentage of annual production for recovery of costs, the remaining production is split between the contractor and State.

Equipment purchased and imported by the contractor becomes the property of the state. With the service company equipment and leased equipment being exempt.

Following activities are being carried out in PSC
  • Review of work Programme and budget of all exploration blocks and fields under PSC’s.
  • Facilitating of statutory and other clearances.
  • Management Committee Meetings.
  • Assignment of Participating Interest.
  • Extension of phases, relinquishment of acreages, assignment, appointment of auditor, approval of auditing account and other PSC related issues as and when arise.
A commitee under chairmanship of C.Rangrajan has been constituted to review the existing production sharing contracts (PSCs) in light of the recent spat between Reliance Industries Ltd. (RIL) and the Petroleum Ministry and a similar recommendation in draft report of CAG.

Captive coal mining from ET

  • ·         Despite having one of the world’s largest reserves of coal, India is unable to dig it up fast enough. This results in lost production and jobs, imports of expensive coal and petroleum, depreciation of the rupee that could have been avoided, leading to higher inflation.
  • ·          Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act of 1973. It made coal mining a public sector monopoly. The law was amended in 1976 to allow captive coal mining for production of iron and steel in the private sector. The law was amended again in 1993 to allow more captive private mining, for power plants and for other notified uses. In 1996, captive mining was extended to cement plants as well.
  • ·         The term "captive" infers being locked up. In the sense of a policy, it is a mandatory allocation of resources. The intent of the captive coal mining policy is to allocate a specific block to a specific need for the country.
  • ·         Coal India lords over mining coal. The mining is pretty crude : dig large pits and scoop out the coal. No underground mining deploying sophisticated technology and safety measures .
  • ·         This inefficient monopoly just cannot meet the domestic demand for coal. The country, in the recent past, has had to import coal to fuel power plants built right at the pithead of coal mines , far away from the coast from where coal has to be moved at high cost.
  • ·         Despite sitting on nearly 100 billion tonnes of coal reserves , waiting to be mined, India today imports more than 70 million tonnes a year. These avoidable imports add to the current account deficit and the rupee’s weakness. The weaker the rupee, the more expensive all imported inputs. So, Coal India’s inability to mine coal fast enough is a contributory factor to unrelenting inflation in the country as well.
  • ·         But this is not Coal India’s only crime. Indian coal is up to 45% shale and rock, noncombustible material that turns into fly ash in power plants. The sensible thing to do is to remove this non-combustible material before coal is loaded on to trains and sent across the country.
  • ·         But Coal India does virtually no beneficiation of coal before it is despatched. This means that railway wagons careen around the country carrying useless shale and rock, wasting precious diesel and power in the process. Roughly 40% of the Railways’ earnings come from coal. At least 50% of the energy spent on haulage will be on coal. Since 40% of the so-called coal is shale and rock, 16% of the Railways revenues come from and 20% of its fuel cost is spent on hauling future flyash all over the place.
  • ·         The most urgent reform required in coal is to scrap state monopoly, open up mining, beneficiation and trading to private enterprise and break up Coal India into half a dozen companies so as to preempt a market-distorting behemoth . 
  • ·         Mining should be done by professional miners who dig up coal, pay royalty on the mined coal and pay corporate tax on profits.
  • ·         Politicians in the states and at the Centre see allocation of captive mines as a prime rent-seeking opportunity. BJP-ruled Rajasthan and Chhattisgarh and Left-run West Bengal stoutly opposed a PMO proposal in 2004 to auction captive mining blocks of coal, and so, allocation was done by a screening committee as in the past, much to everyone’ satisfaction, except for the CAG’s now.
  • ·         .The T L Shankar panel that first mooted auction had suggested as the bid parameter  how much coal can be mined  — not how much money the miner would pay upfront. As regards undue benefit to companies, the real question is, is there any due benefit in captive mining at all? And captive mining is a fallout of state monopoly in coal. Scrap state monopoly: that is the starting point for cleaning up coal.
Guidelines followed for Identification of Coal Blocks for Captive Allocation
The guidelines adopted for demarcating the blocks are such that the developers would face a number of problems in quickly bringing the allotted blocks to the production stage. Ministry of Coal relies on Coal India Ltd (CIL) and Singareni Collieries Company Ltd (SCCL), for identifying the captive coal blocks. The guidelines adopted by CIL & SCCL for identifying and allotting coal blocks for captive mining are as follows:

  •  The blocks offered to private sector should be at reasonable distance from existing mines and projects of CIL in order to avoid operational problems
  •  Preferably, blocks in greenfield areas having less or no development of basic infrastructure like road, rail link, etc. may be allotted to the public/private sector for captive mining. The areas where CIL has already invested in creating such infrastructure for opening new mines should not be handed over to the private sector, except on reimbursement of costs
  •  Blocks already identified for development by CIL where adequate funding is on hand or in sight should not be offered to the private sector
  •  Public/private sector should be asked to bear the full cost of exploration in these blocks which may be offered
  •  For identifying blocks, the requirement of coal for about 30 years would be considered
  •  Others, which include Mine Plan approval under the provisions of Mines and Mineral (Development and Regulation) Act 1957, approval of the Directorate general of Mine Safety, and inspection by Coal Controller for an appropriate enforcement of conservation measures under the provisions of the Coal Mines (Conservation and Development) Act 1974.